Jenkins v. United States Postal Service et al

Filing 54

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (ECF No. 53) and DENIES the defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (ECF No. 45). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/7/2019. (jdh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTWON D. JENKINS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:17-cv-00937-JPG-MAB RANDY COBB, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (ECF No. 53) of Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty with regard to defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution. The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). Here, the Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court: • ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (ECF No. 53); and • DENIES the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (ECF No. 45). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: FEBRUARY 7, 2019 s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?