Murphy v. Baldwin et al

Filing 87

ORDER ADOPTING Report and Recommendation (Doc. 82 ): Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 48 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 7/16/2019. (mah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JAMELL A. MURPHY, Plaintiff, vs. JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 17-CV-1154-SMY-RJD MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YANDLE, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") of United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly (Doc. 82), recommending the denial of Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Injunctive Relief (Doc. 48). No objections have been filed to the Report. For the following reasons, Judge Daly’s Report is ADOPTED. When neither timely nor specific objections to a Report and Recommendation are made, the Court need not conduct a de novo review of the Report. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Instead, the Court reviews the Report for clear error. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). The Court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Here, Judge Daly thoroughly discussed and supported her conclusions that Plaintiff has not demonstrated an entitlement to injunctive relief. The Court finds no clear error in Judge Daly’s findings, analysis and conclusions, and adopts her Report and Recommendation in its Page 1 of 2 entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 48) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 16, 2019 STACI M. YANDLE United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?