Randolph, Sr. v. Transunion, LLC

Filing 26

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 25 ), GRANTS the plaintiff's oral motion to dismiss (Doc. 22 ), FINDS AS MOOT the pending motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 19 ), and DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/13/2018. (jdh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS FREDRICK RANDOLPH, SR. Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:17-cv-01234-JPG-SCW TRANSUNION, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc. 25) of Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams with regard to the plaintiff’s oral motion to voluntarily dismiss this case with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) (Doc. 22). The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). Here, the Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:  ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 25);  GRANTS the plaintiff’s oral motion to dismiss (Doc. 22);  FINDS AS MOOT the pending motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 19); and  DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: FEBRUARY 13, 2018 s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?