Lavite v. Lakin

Filing 45

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 34 ), and FINDS AS MOOT the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 1). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/7/2018. (jdh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS GARY A. LAVITE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:17-cv-01275-JPG-DGW JOHN LAKIN, et. al, Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc. 34) of Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson with regard to the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 1). The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part— the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). Here, the Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:  ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 34); and  FINDS AS MOOT the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 1). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: MARCH 7, 2018 s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?