Lavite v. Lakin
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 34 ), and FINDS AS MOOT the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 1). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/7/2018. (jdh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
GARY A. LAVITE,
Case No. 3:17-cv-01275-JPG-DGW
JOHN LAKIN, et. al,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc.
34) of Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson with regard to the plaintiff’s motion for a
preliminary injunction (Doc. 1). The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—
the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. FED.
R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections
are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews
those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th
Here, the Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the
entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:
ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 34); and
FINDS AS MOOT the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 1).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: MARCH 7, 2018
s/ J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?