Lavite v. Lakin

Filing 63

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (ECF No. 61) and DENIES the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 52). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/16/2018. (jdh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
GARY A. LAVITE,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 3:17-cv-01275-JPG-DGW

JOHN LAKIN, et. al,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (ECF
No. 61) of Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson with regard to the plaintiff’s motion for a
preliminary injunction (ECF No. 52). The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in
part—the findings or recommendations of a magistrate judge in a report and recommendation.
FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which
objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge
reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734,
739 (7th Cir. 1999).
Here, the Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the
entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous, so the Court:


ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (ECF No. 61); and



DENIES the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 52).

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: AUGUST 16, 2018
s/ J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE