Tracy v. Vandergraph et al

Filing 31

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court GRANTS Everett's motion to dismiss (Doc. 13), DENIES plaintiff's motion for a voluntary dismissal (Doc. 21), DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE defendant Michael Everett, and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to terminate Michael Everett as a defendant in this case. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/26/2018. (jdh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS RACHEL R. TRACY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:17-cv-01379-JPG-DGW AARON VANDERGRAPH, and MICHAEL EVERETT, Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on defendant Michael Everett’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) and plaintiff Rachel Tracy’s motion for voluntary dismissal (Doc. 21). The complaint in this case names Michael Everett as a defendant in Counts V, VI, and VII, but does not allege any legal claims against him. Everett has accordingly moved to dismiss himself as a defendant. (Doc. 13.) In response, the plaintiff has moved for a voluntary dismissal of defendant Everett pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). (Doc. 21.) The response is effectively a form of consent to Everett’s motion. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Everett’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 13), DENIES plaintiff’s motion for a voluntary dismissal (Doc. 21), DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE defendant Michael Everett, and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to terminate Michael Everett as a defendant in this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: MARCH 26, 2018 s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?