Cordrey v. Lamb et al

Filing 28

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 24 ) and GRANTING Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 21 ). Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 6/14/2019. (sgp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MARK CORDREY, Plaintiff, vs. JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, M. GOBLE, and WARDEN OF LAWRENCE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 18-CV-107-SMY-RJD MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YANDLE, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly (Doc. 24), recommending that Defendants Warden of Lawrence and Goble’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 21) be granted. No objections have been filed to the Report. For the following reasons, Judge Daly’s Report is ADOPTED. When neither timely nor specific objections to a Report are made, the Court need not conduct a de novo review of the Report. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Instead, the Court reviews the Report for clear error. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). The Court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Here, Judge Daly thoroughly discussed and supported her conclusion that Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this action by failing to provide his current address. The Court finds no error with respect to Judge Daly’s findings, analysis and conclusions, and adopts her Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Page 1 of 2 Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 14, 2019 STACI M. YANDLE United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?