Cramer v. Werlich

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 3/12/2018. (jaj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS TROY CRAMER, No. 16783-047, Petitioner, vs. Case No. 18−cv–0258-DRH T.G. WERLICH, Respondent. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HERNDON, District Judge: Pro se Petitioner Troy Cramer, currently incarcerated in the Federal Correctional Institution Greenville, brings this habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Relying on the recent case of Mathis v. United States, ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016), he argues that his sentence should not have been enhanced as a career offender pursuant to U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINE § 4B1.1. This case is now before the Court for a preliminary review of the Petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in United States District Courts. Without commenting on the merits of Petitioner's claims, the Court concludes that the Petition survives preliminary review under Rule 4 and Rule 1(b). Given the limited record and the still-developing application of Mathis, it is not plainly apparent that Petitioner is not entitled to habeas relief. See United States v. Smith, 668 F. App’x 653 (mem) (7th Cir. 1 2016). Disposition IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Werlich shall answer or otherwise plead within thirty days of the date this order is entered (on or before April 11, 2018).1 This preliminary order to respond does not, of course, preclude the Government from raising any objection or defense it may wish to present. Service upon the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Illinois, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Illinois, shall constitute sufficient service. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Local Rule 72.1(a)(2), this cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud for further pre-trial proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this entire matter be REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Proud for disposition, as contemplated by Local Rule 72.2(b)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), should all the parties consent to such a referral. Petitioner is ADVISED of his continuing obligation to keep the Clerk (and each opposing party) informed of any change in his whereabouts during the pendency of this action. This notification shall be done in writing and not later than seven (7) days after a transfer or other change in address occurs. Failure to provide such notice may result in dismissal of this The response date ordered herein is controlling. Any date that CM/ECF should generate in the course of this litigation is a guideline only. See SDIL-EFR 3. 1 2 action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. Judge Herndon 2018.03.12 10:51:21 -05'00' United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?