Hardin v. IDOC et al

Filing 38

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 1/21/2020. (ksp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ALEX HARDIN, Plaintiff, vs. CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON and CHARLES PEARCE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 18-cv-00583-SMY MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YANDLE, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of United States Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison, recommending that this case be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. (Doc. 35). No objections have been filed to the Report. When neither timely nor specific objections to a Report and Recommendation are made, the Court need not conduct a de novo review of the Report. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). Instead, the Court reviews the Report for clear error. Id. The Court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court finds no error in the Report and agrees with Judge Sison’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter Judgment and to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 21, 2020 s/ Staci M. Yandle_________ STACI M. YANDLE United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?