Ryder v. Wexford Health Sources et al

Filing 50

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The undersigned District Judge ADOPTS in its entirety the Report & Recommendations (Doc. 45 ) submitted by Magistrate Judge Williams and DENIES Plaintiff Ricky Ryder's motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 10 ). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 1/7/2019. (rah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS RICKY RYDER, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, ALFONSO DAVID, KAREN SMOOT, and JEFFREY DENNISON Defendants. Case No. 18-cv-0723-MJR-GCS MEMORANDUM & ORDER REAGAN, Chief Judge: In April 2018, Plaintiff Ricky Ryder filed suit alleging that Defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs related to his knee and back pain and to an eye condition. He seeks a preliminary injunction ordering Defendants to (1) retrieve his medical records from Barnes Hospital; (2) arrange for an optometrist to evaluate and diagnose his eye issues; and (3) treat his ongoing knee and back pain. On December 12, 2018, Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams issued a Report & Recommendations (Doc. 45) recommending that the undersigned deny Ryder’s motion for preliminary injunction. The report clearly stated that any objections were due on or before January 2, 2019. That deadline has passed, and no party has filed objections. As a result, the undersigned need not conduct a de novo review of the Report & Recommendations. See 27 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 1 The undersigned District Judge ADOPTS in its entirety the Report & Recommendations (Doc. 45) submitted by Magistrate Judge Williams and DENIES Plaintiff Ricky Ryder’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 10). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 7, 2019 s/ Michael J. Reagan MICHAEL J. REAGAN Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?