Thompson v. Myers
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 35 ). This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 5/21/2019. (sgp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
RICHARD THOMPSON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MAJOR MYERS,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 18-CV-799-SMY-GCS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YANDLE, District Judge:
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of United States
Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison (Doc. 35), recommending that this case be dismissed with prejudice.
No objections to the Report have been filed. For the following reasons, Judge Sison’s Report and
Recommendation is ADOPTED.
When neither timely nor specific objections to a Report are made, the Court need not conduct
a de novo. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Instead, the Court reviews the Report for clear
error. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). The Court may “accept,
reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate
judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Here, Judge Sison thoroughly discussed and supported his conclusion that Plaintiff Richard
Thompson is has failed to prosecute this case. The Court finds no clear error in Judge Sison’s findings,
analysis, or conclusions, and adopts his Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, this
case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Judgment shall be entered.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 21, 2019
STACI M. YANDLE
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?