Thompson v. Myers

Filing 36

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 35 ). This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Staci M. Yandle on 5/21/2019. (sgp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS RICHARD THOMPSON, Plaintiff, vs. MAJOR MYERS, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 18-CV-799-SMY-GCS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YANDLE, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of United States Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison (Doc. 35), recommending that this case be dismissed with prejudice. No objections to the Report have been filed. For the following reasons, Judge Sison’s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. When neither timely nor specific objections to a Report are made, the Court need not conduct a de novo. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Instead, the Court reviews the Report for clear error. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). The Court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Here, Judge Sison thoroughly discussed and supported his conclusion that Plaintiff Richard Thompson is has failed to prosecute this case. The Court finds no clear error in Judge Sison’s findings, analysis, or conclusions, and adopts his Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Judgment shall be entered. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 21, 2019 STACI M. YANDLE United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?