Jordan v. Attorney General et al
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 46) and DENIES Jordan's motion for a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order (Doc. 21). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 4/22/2019. (jdh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
JOSEPH RAY JORDAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 18-cv-1100-JPG-RJD
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) (Doc.
46) of Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly recommending that the Court deny plaintiff Joseph Ray
Jordan’s motion for a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order (Doc. 21).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are
made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews
those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th
Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire
file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:
•
ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 46); and
•
DENIES Jordan’s motion for a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order
(Doc. 21).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 22, 2019
s/ J. Phil Gilbert
J. PHIL GILBERT
DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?