Chittum v. Hare

Filing 42

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (ECF No. 41) and DENIES the defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 33). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 8/8/2019. (jdh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS BRANDON LEE CHITTUM, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:18-cv-01167-JPG-MAB MICHAEL HARE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty regarding the defendant’s motion to dismiss. (ECF Nos. 33, 41.) The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). Here, no party has objected and the Report survives a clear error review. For that reason, the Court: • ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (ECF No. 41); and • DENIES the defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 33). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: AUGUST 8, 2019 s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?