Otay Group Inc v. Hercules Machinery Corporation

Filing 10

OPINION AND ORDER; plaintiff if ORDERED to file an amended complaint forthwith, properly alleging the defendant's citizenship. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 6/2/09. (jcp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION OTAY GROUP, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) HERCULES MACHINERY CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) CAUSE NO. 1:09-CV-137 OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Otay Group, Inc., filed its complaint in this Court on May 21, 2009, alleging that the Court has diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (Docket # 1.) In its complaint, the Plaintiff alleges that it is a California corporation with its principal place of business in Chula Vista, California. (Compl. ¶ 1.) The Plaintiff further states, "On information and belief, [Defendant] Hercules [Machinery Corporation] is an Indiana corporation and has a principal place of business in Fort Wayne, Indiana." (Compl. ¶ 2.) Plaintiff's complaint, however, is inadequate because "[a]llegations of federal subject matter jurisdiction may not be made on the basis of information and belief, only personal knowledge." Yount v. Shashek, No. Civ. 06-753-GPM, 2006 WL 4017975, at *10 n.1 (S.D. Ill. Dec. 7, 2006) (citing Am.'s Best Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir. 1992)); Ferolie Corp. v. Advantage Sales & Mktg., LLC, No. 04 C 5425, 2004 WL 2433114, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 28, 2004); Hayes v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC, No. 02 C 9106, 2003 WL 187411, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 21, 2003); Multi-M Int'l, Inc., 142 F.R.D. at 152. Consequently, the Plaintiff must properly allege the Defendant's citizenship with personal knowledge. The Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to file an amended complaint forthwith, properly alleging the Defendant's citizenship. SO ORDERED. Enter for this 2nd day of June, 2009. /S/ Roger B. Cosbey Roger B. Cosbey, United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?