Shen v. Cammllarie

Filing 19

OPINION AND ORDER: The Court confirms that Indiana law will apply to the present case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 11/20/09. (cer)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION TING-CHIANG SHEN Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY H. CAMMLLARIE, Defendant, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Cause No.: 1:09-CV-172 OPINION AND ORDER On October 9, 2009, a preliminary pre-trial conference was held in this case, during which the issue was raised of whether the law of China or Indiana applied. The parties were ordered to submit briefs on the matter, which they have now done. (Docket ## 17, 18.) Both parties agree that Indiana law should govern the present dispute. (Def.'s Mem. 5, Pl.'s Mem. 1.) As a general rule, "[c]ourts do not worry about conflicts of laws unless the parties disagree on which state's law applies." Auto-Owners Insur. Co. v. Websolv Computing, Inc., 580 F.3d 543, 547 (7th Cir. 2009) (citing Wood v. Mid-Valley, Inc., 942 F.2d 425, 427 (7th Cir. 1991)). Furthermore, the Court finds that under the Indiana choice of law provisions, Indiana is the forum with the most intimate contacts to the facts of this dispute. See Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Recticel Foam Corp., 716 N.E.2d 1015, 1024 (Ind. App. 1999). The Court therefore confirms that Indiana law will apply to the present case. SO ORDERED. Entered for November 20, 2009. /S/ Roger B. Cosbey Roger B. Cosbey, United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?