Lamb v. Select Medical Corporation

Filing 31

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 30 MOTION (Joint) for Protective Order by Plaintiff Vickie L Lamb. The parties may submit a further revised protective order consistent with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(7) and Seventh Circuit case law. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 9/28/11. (cer)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION VICKIE L. LAMB, Plaintiff, v. SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITALFORT WAYNE, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO. 1:10-CV-469 OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is a stipulated motion by the parties seeking approval of a revised proposed protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). (Docket # 30.) As the proposed order is deficient, it will be DENIED. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(7) allows the Court to enter a protective order for good cause shown. However, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has made it clear that a protective order may only issue if the order “makes explicit that either party and any interested member of the public can challenge the secreting of particular documents.” Citizens First Nat’l Bank of Princeton v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 178 F.3d 943, 945 (7th Cir. 1999). Language permitting an interested member of the public to challenge the secreting of particular documents is missing from the revised proposed protective order.1 For this reason, the Court hereby DENIES the stipulated motion seeking approval of the 1 This term was included in the parties’ first proposed protective order (Docket # 28), but apparently was dropped in the revised proposed protective order. revised proposed protective order submitted by the parties (Docket # 30). Of course, the parties may submit a further revised protective order consistent with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(7) and Seventh Circuit case law. SO ORDERED. Enter for this 28th day of September, 2011. S/ Roger B. Cosbey Roger B. Cosbey, United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?