Regadanz v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING 16 Report and Recommendations in its entirety and AFFIRMING the Commissioner's decision. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 3/19/13. (lhc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
FORT WAYNE DIVISION
WILLIAM REGADANZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of
Social Security
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 1:12-CV-14-TLS
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 16] of
United States Magistrate Judge Roger B. Cosbey, which was filed on November 13, 2012.
In his Report and Recommendation, Judge Cosbey recommends that the Commissioner’s
decision be affirmed. Judge Cosbey also gave notice that within fourteen (14) days after being
served with a copy of this recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific, written
objections to the proposed findings or recommendations.
This Court’s review of a magistrate’s report and recommendation is governed by 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), which provides in part:
A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the
report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is
made. A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the
findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The judge may also
receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with
instructions.
The statute permits objections to the magistrate’s report and recommendations to be made within
fourteen days of service of a copy of the report. Id.; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (setting forth
procedures for objecting to a magistrate’s report and recommendation and the district court’s
resolution of any objections).
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation submitted by Judge
Cosbey and finds that his proposed disposition is well taken. As of the date of this Order, no
objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed, and the time for making objections
has now passed. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation prepared by Judge Cosbey,
the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 16] in its entirety and AFFIRMS
the Commissioner’s decision for the reasons set forth in Judge Cosbey’s analysis.
SO ORDERED on March 19, 2013.
s/ Theresa L. Springmann
THERESA L. SPRINGMANN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?