Saratoga Potato Chip Company Inc et al v. Classic Foods Inc et al

Filing 98

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of United States Magistrate Judge in their entirety for 91 Motion for Sanctions filed by Saratoga Potato Chip Company Inc, Saratoga Potato Chips LLC: Cuetara is the alter ego of Classic, as alleg ed in Count VI of the amended complaint; and Plaintiff is awarded expenses and fees in the amount of $3,420 against Classic and Cuetara, jointly and severally. The Court denies Plaintiffs motion in all other respects. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 12/9/15. (mc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA Saratoga Potato Chips Company, Inc., a/k/a Olde York Potato Chips, et al., Plaintiff, Case No. 1:12-CV-452 JVB v. Cuetara Holdings Inc. et al., Defendants. ORDER The Court referred this case to the Honorable Susan L. Collins, United States Magistrate Judge for this District, for a Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (DE 91). On October 29, 2015, Judge Collins issued such a report, recommending that Plaintiff’s motion be granted in part and that certain sanctions be imposed in part. Judge Collins advised the parties that they had fourteen days for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation, but, to date, no objections have been filed. The Court adopts the report and the recommendations in their entirety. Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion and rules as follows: 1. For purposes of this action, Cuetara is the alter ego of Classic, as alleged in Count VI of the amended complaint; and 2. Plaintiff is awarded expenses and fees in the amount of $3,420 against Classic and Cuetara, jointly and severally. The Court denies Plaintiff’s motion in all other respects. SO ORDERED on December 9, 2015. s/ Joseph S. Van Bokkelen JOSEPH S. VAN BOKKELEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?