Tharp v. Franck's Lab Inc et al
OPINION AND ORDER re 1 COMPLAINT against Anthony James Campbell RPh, Paul W Franck RPh, Franck's Lab Inc, Wells Pharmacy Network LLC. Plaintiff ORDERED to file Amended Complaint by 3/19/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 3/5/13. (lhc) Modified on 3/6/2013 (lhc).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
FORT WAYNE DIVISION
FRANCK’S LAB, INC., Individually and
d/b/a Franck’s Compounding Lab and/or
Franck’s Pharmacy, Inc.; WELLS
PHARMACY NETWORK, L.L.C.;
PAUL W. FRANCK, R.Ph.; and
ANTHONY JAMES CAMPBELL, R.Ph.,
CAUSE NO. 1:13-CV-61
OPINION AND ORDER
This case was filed in this Court on March 4, 2013, based on diversity jurisdiction
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (Docket # 1.) The Complaint alleges that Defendant Paul W.
Franck was a principal and shareholder of Franck’s Lab, Inc., and a licensed pharmacist in
Florida and that Defendant Anthony James Campbell was a lead chemist with Franck’s Lab, Inc.
(Compl. ¶¶ 6-7.) The Complaint further states that “Defendant Wells Pharmacy Network,
L.L.C., is a Florida limited liability corporation, not registered but doing business in the State of
Indiana . . . .” (Compl. ¶ 5.)
The Complaint, however, is inadequate for two reasons. First, regarding Defendants Paul
Franck and Anthony Campbell, the Complaint contains no allegations concerning their
citizenship. “For natural persons, state citizenship is determined by one’s domicile.” Dausch v.
Rykse, 9 F.3d 1244, 1245 (7th Cir. 1993); see also Heinen v. Northrop Grumman Corp., 671
F.3d 669, 670 (7th Cir. 2012) (“But residence may or may not demonstrate citizenship, which
depends on domicile—that is to say, the state in which a person intends to live over the long
run.”); Am.’s Best Inns, Inc. v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., 980 F.2d 1072, 1074 (7th Cir. 1992)
(“In federal law citizenship means domicile, not residence.”). Therefore, the Court must be
advised of the citizenship of Defendants Paul Franck and Anthony Campbell, which is based on
As to Defendant Wells Pharmacy Network, L.L.C., a limited liability company’s
citizenship “for purposes of . . . diversity jurisdiction is the citizenship of its members.”
Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998). Therefore, the Court must be advised
of the citizenship of all the members of Wells Pharmacy Network, L.L.C. to ensure that none of
its members share a common citizenship with Plaintiff. Hicklin Eng’g, L.C. v. Bartell, 439 F.3d
346, 347 (7th Cir. 2006). Moreover, citizenship must be “traced through multiple levels” for
those members of Wells Network Pharmacy, L.L.C. who are a partnership or a limited liability
company, as anything less can result in a dismissal or remand for want of jurisdiction. Mut.
Assignment & Indem. Co. v. Lind-Waldock & Co., LLC, 364 F.3d 858, 861 (7th Cir. 2004).
Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED to supplement the record by filing an Amended
Complaint on or before March 19, 2013, properly alleging the citizenship of Defendant Paul W.
Franck, Defendant Anthony James Campbell, and Defendant Wells Pharmacy Network, L.L.C.
Enter for this 5th day of March, 2013.
/S/ Roger B. Cosbey
Roger B. Cosbey,
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?