Bonar v. Intercon Carriers LC et al

Filing 13

OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants are ORDERED to supplement the record on or before 1/20/2015, by filing an Amended Notice of Removal that properly alleges the citizenship of each party, including the identity and citizenship of each member of Defendant Intercon Carriers, L.C. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 1/6/2015. (lhc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
FORT WAYNE DIVISION
BRADLEY BONAR,
Plaintiff,
v.
INTERCON CARRIERS, L.C., and
MELITON SILVA,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CAUSE NO. 1:14-CV-402

OPINION AND ORDER
Defendants Intercon Carriers, L.C., and Meliton Silva removed this case here on
December 23, 2014, from Noble Circuit Court, Albion, Indiana, alleging that the Court has
diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (Docket # 1.) In the Notice of Removal,
Defendants allege that Plaintiff Bradley Bonar is a citizen of the State of Indiana; Defendant
Meliton Silva is a citizen of the State of Texas; and Defendant Intercon Carriers, L.C., “is a
limited liability company, and the two members of Intercon Carriers, L.C., are both citizens of
the State of Texas.” (Notice of Removal ¶¶ 5-7.)
Defendants’ jurisdictional allegations inadequately set forth the citizenship of Intercon
Carriers, L.C. As the party seeking to invoke federal diversity jurisdiction, Defendants bear the
burden of demonstrating that the requirement of complete diversity has been met. Chase v.
Shop’n Save Warehouse Foods, Inc., 110 F.3d 424, 427 (7th Cir. 1997). Defendants cannot, as
they attempt to do here, merely allege a “naked declaration that there is diversity of citizenship”
in its Notice of Removal. Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLC, 487 F.3d 531, 533 (7th Cir. 2007).
A limited liability company’s citizenship “for purposes of . . . diversity jurisdiction is the
citizenship of its members.” Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998). Thus,

the Court must be advised of the identity of each member of Defendant Intercon Carriers, L.C.,
and such member’s citizenship. Hicklin Eng’g, L.C. v. Bartell, 439 F.3d 346, 347 (7th Cir.
2006); see generally Guar. Nat’l Title Co. v. J.E.G. Assocs., 101 F.3d 57, 59 (7th Cir. 1996)
(explaining that the court would “need to know the name and citizenship(s)” of each partner for
diversity jurisdiction purposes).
Therefore, Defendants are ORDERED to supplement the record on or before January 20,
2015, by filing an Amended Notice of Removal that properly alleges the citizenship of each
party, including the identity and citizenship of each member of Defendant Intercon Carriers, L.C.
SO ORDERED.
Enter for this 6th day of January 2015.
s/ Roger B. Cosbey
Roger B. Cosbey,
United States Magistrate Judge

2