Smith v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al

Filing 34

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 25 MOTION to Bifurcate and Stay Discovery filed by Nationwide Affinity Insurance Company; DENYING 25 MOTION to Bifurcate and Stay Discovery by Defendant Nationwide Affinity Insurance Company. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 7/14/2015. (lhc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION PAM SMITH, Plaintiff, v. PHH MORTGAGE CORP., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:15 CV 10 ORDER Defendant Nationwide Affinity Insurance Company moved to bifurcate Count II of plaintiff’s complaint from Count I of plaintiff’s complaint, and also requested a stay on all discovery on Count II until Count I is resolved. (DE # 25.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) & (C), FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), and LOCAL RULE 72-1(b), the court referred this discovery-related motion to United States Magistrate Judge Susan L. Collins for a report and recommendation on the disposition of defendant’s motion. (DE # 32.) In the report and recommendation, Magistrate Judge Collins recommended that the court deny defendant’s motion, but also recommended that defendant be allowed “to raise the bifurcation issue again after the close of discovery and ruling on dispositive motions if discovery reveals proof of actual prejudice that [defendant] will suffer.” (DE # 33 at 10-11.) No objections to Magistrate Judge Collins’s report and recommendation have been filed, and the time to file any objections has now passed. Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 72(b)(2). Therefore, the court accepts and adopts Magistrate Judge Collins’s report and recommendation and hereby orders that defendants’ motion (DE # 25) be DENIED. Defendant is free to raise the bifurcation issue again as set out in the report and recommendation. SO ORDERED. Date: July 14, 2015 s/James T. Moody JUDGE JAMES T. MOODY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?