Miller et al v. Plymouth City of et al

Filing 224

ORDER: Court overrules 207 Plaintiff's Objection and ACCEPTS 199 Judge Cherry's Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 169 Motion is DENIED. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 9/17/2010. (tc) cc: Plaintiffs

Download PDF
United States District Court Northern District of Indiana Hammond Division KEVIN D. MILLER and JAMILA D. MILLER Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF PLYMOUTH, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:09-CV-205 JVB ORDER On August 2, 2010, Magistrate Judge Paul Cherry issued a Report and Recommendation on Plaintiffs' Joint First Rule 37 Motion for Sanctions Against Defendants City of Plymouth and John Weir. Judge Cherry recommended that the Court deny Plaintiff's motion. Plaintiffs timely objected to the Report and Recommendation on August 16, 2010. Plaintiffs assert that Defendants have engaged in practices designed to frustrate discovery and ask the Court to sanction the Defendants by entering a default judgment against them, prohibiting them from opposing various facts and claims, prohibiting them from introducing testimony and materials into evidence opposing certain facts and claims, and striking their "qualified immunity" defense. Judge Cherry found that while some of defendant's objections to interrogatories were unwarranted and some answers were not satisfactory, on the whole the Defendant's actions did not warrant sanctions. Upon review of the pleadings and motions filed in this case, it is the Court's finding that Judge Cherry's Report and Recommendation should be accepted. Accordingly, the Court overrules Plaintiff's Objection [DE 207] and ACCEPTS Judge Cherry's Report and Recommendation [DE 199]. Plaintiff's Motion [DE 169] is DENIED. SO ORDERED on September 17, 2010. s/ Joseph S. Van Bokkelen Joseph S. Van Bokkelen United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?