Chorak v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
25
OPINION AND ORDER granting 23 Petition for Attorney Fee Pursuant to § 206(b)(1). Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/23/2013. (rmn)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
JANNE C. CHORAK,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER
OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL NO. 2:11cv114
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on a “Petition for Attorney Fee Pursuant to § 206(b)(1)”,
filed by Frederick J. Daley, Jr. (“Petitioner”), one of the attorneys for the Plaintiff, Janne C.
Chorak, on August 21, 2013. The defendant has not objected to the motion.
For the following reasons, the motion will be granted.
Discussion
Petitioner represented Plaintiff in a civil action before this Court for judicial review of
the Commissioner’s unfavorable decision. The Court reversed and remanded this case for
further proceedings on November 14, 2011. Thus, the Court has jurisdiction over this fee petition
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Plaintiff subsequently prevailed on remand when the ALJ issued
a favorable decision on May 2, 2013 and awarded benefits back to December 2006. The
Commissioner’s Office of Central Operations calculated the benefits and awarded Plaintiff
$78,668.90 in total past-due benefits. Of this amount, $19,667.23 represents 25% of the award
and was withheld for the direct payment of an attorney fee by the Social Security
Administration.
Petitioner received compensation in the amount of $3,857.75 for work before the court
under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, for 34.47 hours of legal services.
Section 206(b)(1) of the Social Security Act, permits the court to award a reasonable fee for
work before the court not to exceed 25% of past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by
reason of a judgment rendered in favor of the claimant. 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). Petitioner
requests that the full amount of 25% be awarded to counsel, in accordance with the fee
agreement entered into between Plaintiff and the Petitioner.
Due to the contingent nature of the representation in this case, the express contract
between Plaintiff and the Petitioner and the absence of any reasons why the award from the
overall past due benefits would be unjust, the court approves a fee authorization in the amount of
$19,667.23 pursuant to § 206(b)(1) of the Social Security Act, and Petitioner shall refund the
EAJA fee of $3,857.75 to Plaintiff.
Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Petitioner’s fee petition [DE 21] is hereby GRANTED.
Entered: September 23, 2013.
s/ William C. Lee
William C. Lee, Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?