Mosley v. Armstrong
Filing
30
ORDER: Court ACCEPTS 29 Judge Cherry's Report and Recommendation and FINDS that it has subject matter jurisdiction to hear this case. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 6/21/2013. cc: Pro se Pltf (tc)
United States District Court
Northern District of Indiana
Hammond Division
MARCUS MOSLEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
TIMOTHY ARMSTRONG,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 2:11-CV-435 JVB
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Paul Cherry’s Report and
Recommendation (DE 29) on the question of whether this Court has subject matter jurisdiction
over this case. Judge Cherry’s report states that this Court does have subject matter jurisdiction
to hear this case. No objections have been filed to Judge Cherry’s Report and Recommendation.
Having reviewed the report, the Court agrees with its findings. Accordingly, the Court
accepts Judge Cherry’s Report and Recommendation and finds that it has subject matter
jurisdiction to hear this case.
SO ORDERED on June 21, 2013
s/ Joseph S. Van Bokkelen
Joseph S. Van Bokkelen
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?