Cigler v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

Filing 22

OPINION AND ORDER denying 21 Motion for clarification. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/23/15. cc: Cigler (mc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
JOSEPH A. CIGLER,
Plaintiff,
v.
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL NO. 2:15cv17

OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on a “Motion for Clarification of Opinion and Order”, filed
by the Plaintiff, Joseph A. Cigler (“Cigler”), proceeding pro se, on September 17, 2015. The
defendant has declined to file a response. For the following reasons, the motion will be denied.
Cigler filed this case in state court on December 1, 2014. The defendant then removed to
this court on January 12, 2015. On January 20, 2015, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss for
failure to state a claim, which prompted Cigler to file a motion to remand the case back to state
court. On March 18, 2015, this court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss and denied
Cigler’s motion to remand.
On April 3, 2015, Cigler filed a motion to reopen the case, which was denied on May 27,
2015. Undeterred, on July 13, 2015, Cigler filed another motion to reopen case and remand to
state court. This motion was denied on August 13, 2015.
Cigler has now filed a motion for clarification, in which he essentially re-states his belief
that he has a valid claim against the defendant and should be able to proceed with his case.
Nevertheless, for the reasons stated in this court’s previous orders, Cigler has failed to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted. Thus, the grant of the motion to dismiss was proper and

Cigler’s “motion for clarification” will be denied. If Cigler continues to disagree with this
court’s rulings, it is suggested that Cigler seek redress with the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, Cigler’s “motion for clarification” is hereby DENIED.

Entered: September 23, 2015.

s/ William C. Lee
William C. Lee, Judge
United States District Court

2