Trzeciak v. Padilla et al

Filing 2

OPINION AND ORDER: The court DISMISSES this case as frivolous. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 6/10/2015. (lhc)(cc: Pla)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION JOSEPH TRZECIAK, SR., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, vs. NICHOLAS J. PADILLA, et al., Defendants. CAUSE NO. 2:15-CV-218 OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on document captioned “Criminal Complaint” (DE 1) filed by Joseph Trzeciak, Sr., a pro se prisoner, on June 8, 2015, in which he is attempting to bring unspecified criminal charges against 25 federal, Illinois, and Indiana prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and agencies which were involved in his federal and State criminal prosecutions. However, Trzeciak does not have the authority to initiate federal criminal charges against anyone. Only the United States Attorney General has such authority. See United States v. Palumbo Bros., Inc., 145 F.3d 850, 865 (7th Cir. 1988) (“[C]riminal prosecution is an executive function within the exclusive prerogative of the Attorney General.”) (quotation marks and citation omitted). For the reasons set forth above, the court DISMISSES this case as frivolous. DATED: June 10, 2015 /s/RUDY LOZANO, Judge United State District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?