Trzeciak v. Padilla et al
Filing
2
OPINION AND ORDER: The court DISMISSES this case as frivolous. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 6/10/2015. (lhc)(cc: Pla)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
HAMMOND DIVISION
JOSEPH TRZECIAK, SR.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
vs.
NICHOLAS J. PADILLA, et al.,
Defendants.
CAUSE NO. 2:15-CV-218
OPINION AND ORDER
This
matter
is
before
the
Court
on
document
captioned
“Criminal Complaint” (DE 1) filed by Joseph Trzeciak, Sr., a pro se
prisoner, on June 8, 2015, in which he is attempting to bring
unspecified criminal charges against 25 federal, Illinois, and
Indiana prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and agencies which
were involved in his federal and State criminal prosecutions.
However, Trzeciak does not have the authority to initiate federal
criminal charges against anyone. Only the United States Attorney
General has such authority. See United States v. Palumbo Bros.,
Inc., 145 F.3d 850, 865 (7th Cir. 1988) (“[C]riminal prosecution is
an executive function within the exclusive prerogative of the
Attorney General.”) (quotation marks and citation omitted).
For the reasons set forth above, the court DISMISSES this case
as frivolous.
DATED: June 10, 2015
/s/RUDY LOZANO, Judge
United State District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?