Stephenson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 9 Report and Recommendations; DISMISSING this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 6/17/09. (jld)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION CHARLENE A. STEPHENSON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO. 3:08-CV-144 ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Christopher Nuechterlein. (DE 9.) Judge Nuechterlein previously ordered Plaintiff Charlene A. Stephenson to file a status report advising whether she would obtain representation or proceed pro se. (DE 7.) She was to do so by April 30, 2009. (Id.) She declined to do so. Judge Nuechterlein then issued an order setting a new deadline for her to advise the Court about whether she would be represented and to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute on May 4. (DE 8.) The deadline for Stephenson to make that filing was May 15. (Id.) Again, she declined. So on May 26, Judge Nuechterlein issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (DE 9.) Stephenson was given until June 12 to respond. Yet again, she declined. To date, neither party has filed an objection to Magistrate Nuechterlein's Report and Recommendation. The Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and agreeing with the reasoning therein, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is further directed to treat this matter as TERMINATED and all further settings are hereby VACATED. SO ORDERED. ENTERED: June 17, 2009 s/ Philip P. Simon PHILIP P. SIMON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?