Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC v. Forest River Inc

Filing 88

MOTION to Compel Production of Documents from Heartland and Baker & Daniels by Counter Claimant Forest River Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Excerpt of '747 Patent, # 2 Exhibit B - Email of 3/14/05, # 3 Exhibit C - Excerpt of '841 Patent, # 4 Exhibit D - Excerpt of '650 Patent, # 5 Exhibit E - Excerpt of Taylor Dep., # 6 Exhibit F - FR Doc. Req. #9, # 7 Exhibit G - FR Doc. Req. #32, # 8 Exhibit H - Heartland Resp. to #9, # 9 Exhibit I - Heartland Resp. to #32, # 10 Exhibit J - B&D Subpoena, # 11 Exhibit K - Gallagher diary, # 12 Exhibit L - Brotherson CC, # 13 Exhibit M - Brotherson Letter, # 14 Appendix Rule 37 Certification, # 15 Supplement Supplement to Certification)(Fountain, Ryan)

Download PDF
Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC v. Forest River Inc Doc. 88 Att. 5 case 3:08-cv-00490-TLS document 88-6 filed 02/01/10 page 1 of 1 Request No. 7: All documents and things which describe, refer to, discuss, or relate to the conception and/or reduction to practice of any invention of the patent in this lawsuit, including without limitation, any invention disclosures given to anyone, any prototypes of any such invention, and any testing of any such invention. RESPONSE: Request No. 8: All documents and things which describe, refer to, discuss, or relate to any product or entity which Heartland has ever a.) examined to determine if it infringes upon the patent in this lawsuit, or b.) accused of infringing upon the patent in this lawsuit. RESPONSE: Request No. 9: To the extent not otherwise requested herein, all documents and things which describe, refer to, discuss, or relate to any investigation by or on behalf of Heartland into the patentability of the invention(s) of the patent in this lawsuit or the validity of the patent in this lawsuit, including the identity of any prior art which is "material" to the claims of the patents in this lawsuit, as that term is meant in 37 C.F.R. §1.56. RESPONSE: Request No. 10: If, during prosecution of the patent application for the patent in this lawsuit or of any other patent application identified in response to Request No. 1, Heartland contended that any of the claims were not "obvious" within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. §103, then produce the documents and things sufficient to show both Heartland's factual basis for determining the "level of ordinary Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?