Royer et al v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company

Filing 29

OPINION AND ORDER denying 28 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher A Nuechterlein on 1/20/10. (ksc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION BRIAN ROYER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO. 3:09-CV-112 RL OPINION AND ORDER On January 19, 2010, Defendant, USAA Casualty Insurance Company ("USAA"), filed a motion to extend the discovery deadline. However, USAA's motion was unaccompanied by a form of order, pursuant to Local Rule 5.1. See N.D. L.R. 5.1(e) ("The filing of a motion or petition requiring the entry of a routine or uncontested order by the judge or the clerk shall be accompanied by a suitable form of order together with sufficient copies thereof for service upon all parties or their counsel."). Because USAA has failed to comply with the local rules, its motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. [Doc. No. 28]. USAA may refile its motion along with the appropriate form of order. SO ORDERED. Dated this 20th Day of January, 2010. S/Christopher A. Nuechterlein Christopher A. Nuechterlein United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?