United States of America v. Andersen
Filing
16
OPINION: DENYING 15 Motion for Hearing or Dismissal; DIRECTING clerk to send copy of 14 Order and Opinion. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 1/26/15. ( 14 sent to respondent)(jld)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
SOUTH BEND DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner,
v.
RYAN ANDERSEN d/b/a
RYNO MANAGEMENT,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CAUSE NO.:3:14-MC-11-JEM
OPINION
This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Hearing or Dismissal [DE 15], filed by
Respondent, pro se, January 22, 2015. Respondent requests the Court dismiss the compliance ordered
by this Court with a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) administrative subpoena.
Respondent previously filed a Motion for Hearing or Dismissal on December 17, 2014. The
Petitioner responded January 5, 2015, and the Respondent did not reply. The Court denied the motion
January 22, 2015, the same day the instant Motion was filed. The instant Motion does not provide any
new facts to deny enforcement of the EPA’s subpoena, but merely restates Respondent’s objection to the
amount of requested information. Accordingly, the Court’s analysis contained in its January 22, 2015,
Order and Opinion, which Respondent may not have yet received at the time of the instant Motion,
continues to apply.
For the foregoing reasons, the Court hereby DENIES Motion for Hearing or Dismissal [DE 15].
The Court hereby DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send a copy of the Court’s January 22, 2015, Order
and Opinion [DE 14].
SO ORDERED this 26th day of January, 2015.
s/ John E. Martin
MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
cc:
All counsel of record;
Ryan Andersen, pro se
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?