United States of America v. Andersen

Filing 16

OPINION: DENYING 15 Motion for Hearing or Dismissal; DIRECTING clerk to send copy of 14 Order and Opinion. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 1/26/15. ( 14 sent to respondent)(jld)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. RYAN ANDERSEN d/b/a RYNO MANAGEMENT, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO.:3:14-MC-11-JEM OPINION This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Hearing or Dismissal [DE 15], filed by Respondent, pro se, January 22, 2015. Respondent requests the Court dismiss the compliance ordered by this Court with a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) administrative subpoena. Respondent previously filed a Motion for Hearing or Dismissal on December 17, 2014. The Petitioner responded January 5, 2015, and the Respondent did not reply. The Court denied the motion January 22, 2015, the same day the instant Motion was filed. The instant Motion does not provide any new facts to deny enforcement of the EPA’s subpoena, but merely restates Respondent’s objection to the amount of requested information. Accordingly, the Court’s analysis contained in its January 22, 2015, Order and Opinion, which Respondent may not have yet received at the time of the instant Motion, continues to apply. For the foregoing reasons, the Court hereby DENIES Motion for Hearing or Dismissal [DE 15]. The Court hereby DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send a copy of the Court’s January 22, 2015, Order and Opinion [DE 14]. SO ORDERED this 26th day of January, 2015. s/ John E. Martin MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT cc: All counsel of record; Ryan Andersen, pro se

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?