Boyd v. Superintendent

Filing 3

OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to SECTION 2254 HABEAS CORPUS RULE 4 and this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 5/19/2015. (cc: Boyd)(rmc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION SHAVON TYVELL BOYD, Petitioner, vs. SUPERINTENDENT, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO. 3:15-CV-207 OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Petition under 28 U.S.C. Paragraph 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Shavon Tyvell Boyd, a pro se prisoner, on May 14, 2015. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the petition (DE #1). BACKGROUND Shavon Boyd filed a habeas corpus petition challenging WCC 1503-0070, a prison disciplinary proceeding held at the Westville Correctional Facility. On March 11, 2015, the Disciplinary Hearing Body (DHB) found him guilty of Abuse of Mail in violation of C-361. As a result, he was sanctioned with the loss of 30 days earned credit time, but the deprivation was suspended and has not yet been imposed. (DE #1 at 1.) As such, he has not yet lost any earned credit time as a result of this hearing. DISCUSSION A prison disciplinary action can only be challenged in a habeas corpus proceeding where it results in the lengthening of the duration of confinement. Hadley v. Holmes, 341 F.3d 661, 664 (7th Cir. 2003). Here, because this disciplinary proceeding did not result in the lengthening of the duration of his confinement, habeas corpus relief is not available. Because there is no relief that he can obtain in this habeas corpus proceeding, the petition will be denied. If in the future the suspended sanction is imposed, then he may file another habeas corpus petition challenging this hearing. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, the Court DENIES the petition pursuant to SECTION 2254 HABEAS CORPUS RULE 4 and this case is dismissed without prejudice. (DE #1). DATED: May 19, 2015 /s/RUDY LOZANO, Judge United State District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?