Pramuk v. Hiestand et al

Filing 2

OPINION AND ORDER: Pla granted until 10/14/2016, to either pay the filing fee or to petition the Court to proceed without the prepayment of such fee. Failure to abide by this order will result in dismissal of this case w/o further notice. Clerk DIRECTED to mail, along with this Order, the Court's pre-printed form to request in forma pauperis status. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/14/2016. (cc: Pla with form) (lns)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SUSAN E. PRAMUK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) TERRY HIESTAND, ) PATRICK PRAMUK, CHERYL L. ) MONTALBANO RAHMANY, THE ) FOOD PANTRY, PORTER COUNTY ) SUPERIOR COURT, TILTON & TILTON ) ) ) Defendants. ) CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-572 OPINION AND ORDER On August 26, 2016, Susan E. Pramuk filed a complaint against various defendants in this Court but failed to pay the filing fee or seek leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Pramuk may not proceed with her complaint unless she files the $400 fee, see 28 U.S.C. ' 1914 and the District Court Miscellaneous Fee Schedule, or is excused by the Court from paying such fee as set out in 28 U.S.C. ' 1915. Mindful of her pro se status, the Court grants Ms. Pramuk until October 14, 2016, to either pay the filing fee or to petition the Court to proceed without the prepayment of such fee. Failure to abide by this order will result in dismissal of this case without further notice. The CLERK is DIRECTED to mail, along with this Order, the court’s pre-printed form to request in forma pauperis status. SO ORDERED. This 14th day of September, 2016. s/ William C. Lee United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?