Coleman v. Superintendent
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTS 11 MOTION to Dismiss Petition as Moot by Respondent Superintendent and DISMISSES this case. The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 6/15/2017. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lhc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
SOUTH BEND DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER L. COLEMAN,
CAUSE NO. 3:17-CV-007-JD-JEM
OPINION AND ORDER
Christopher L. Coleman, a pro se prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254
challenging his prison disciplinary hearing in MCF 16-07-402 where a Disciplinary Hearing Officer
(DHO) found him guilty of attempting to escape in violation of Indiana Department of Correction
(IDOC) policy A-108 and A-111. ECF 1 at 1. As a result, he was sanctioned with the loss of 90
days earned credit time and was demoted from Credit Class 1 to Credit Class 2. Id.
After Coleman filed his petition, the IDOC vacated the guilty finding, restored his earned
credit time, and dismissed the charges. ECF 11-2. Based on the IDOC’s action, the Respondent filed
a motion to dismiss arguing Coleman’s petition is now moot. ECF 11. Coleman did not file a
response and the time for doing so has passed. See N.D. Ind. L. Cr. R. 47-2.
The Respondent is correct: the petition is moot. The court cannot grant any relief in this case
because the finding of guilt has already vacated and his earned credit time restored. That is to say,
Coleman has already won and there is no case left for this court to decide. See Hadley v. Holmes,
341 F.3d 661, 664 (7th Cir. 2003) (prisoner can challenge prison disciplinary determination in
habeas proceeding only when it resulted in a sanction that lengthened the duration of his
For these reasons, the court GRANTS the motion to dismiss (ECF 11) and DISMISSES this
case. The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case.
ENTERED: June 15, 2017
/s/ JON E. DEGUILIO
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?