Turner Bey v. Neal et al
Filing
15
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Mr. Turner Bey leave to proceed against Sgt. Redden in his individual capacity for monetary damages for using excessive force against him on November 18, 2017, in violation of the Eighth Amendment; DISMISSES all other claims; DISMISSES Lt. Connelly and Capt. Dykstra; DIRECTS the clerk and the United States Marshals Service to issue and serve process on Sgt. Redden at the Indiana Department of Correction with a copy of this order and the amended comp laint 12 as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); and ORDERS Sgt. Redden to respond, as provided for in the FRCP and N.D. IND. L.R. 10.1, only to the claim for which the pro se plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 8/16/2018. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lhc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
SOUTH BEND DIVISION
AKEEM TURNER BEY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SGT. REDDEN, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CAUSE NO. 3:18-CV-119 RLM
OPINION AND ORDER
Akeem Turner Bey, a prisoner representing himself, filed an amended
complaint alleging Sgt. Redden used excessive force against him on November 18,
2017, at the Indiana State Prison. A filing by an unrepresented party “is to be
liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be
held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.”
Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (quotation marks and citations
omitted). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must review the merits of a prisoner
complaint and dismiss it if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a
defendant who is immune from such relief.
This is what Mr. Turner Bey alleges: On November 18, 2017, Mr. Turner Bey
went outside while it was raining. After being outside for about an hour, he asked
an officer to escort him back inside. Officer Ralph showed up and began to walk
1
Mr. Turner Bey to the front of DCH when they came into contact with Sgt. Redden.
Mr. Turner Bey asked Sgt. Redden numerous times if he could speak with a
lieutenant to complain about having to go outside for recreation, which upset Sgt.
Redden, who then kicked Mr. Turner Bey in his leg and pulled him to the ground.
This caused Mr. Turner Bey to fall and injure his leg. After this incident, Mr.
Turner Bey filed a grievance, but he alleges that Lt. Connelly and Capt. Dykstra
ignored it and refused to properly investigate the incident. Mr. Turner Bey sues
all three defendants for money damages.
First, Mr. Turner Bey alleges that Sgt. Redden used excessive force against
him when he kicked him in the leg and threw him to the ground. The “core
requirement” for an excessive force claim is that the defendant “used force not in
a good-faith effort to maintain or restore discipline, but maliciously and
sadistically to cause harm.” Hendrickson v. Cooper, 589 F.3d 887, 890 (7th Cir.
2009) (citation omitted). Several factors guide the inquiry of whether an officer’s
use of force was legitimate or malicious, including the need for an application of
force, the amount of force used, and the extent of the injury suffered by the
prisoner. Id. Mr. Turner Bey claims that Sgt. Redden assaulted him to maliciously
to cause harm. This is sufficient to state a claim against Sgt. Redden for use of
excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
Next, Mr. Turner Bey alleges that he later wrote a request to Lt. Connelly
and Capt. Dykstra, apparently informing them of what happened on November 18,
2
2017. He complains that neither responded. However, that the incident was
reported to these officers is not a basis for liability. “Only persons who cause or
participate in the violations are responsible.” George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 609
(7th Cir. 2007). “[P]ublic employees are responsible for their own misdeeds but not
for anyone else’s.” Burks v. Raemisch, 555 F.3d 592, 596 (7th Cir. 2009). These
allegations don’t state a claim against either Lt. Connelly or Capt. Dykstra.
For these reasons, the court:
(1) GRANTS Mr. Turner Bey leave to proceed against Sgt. Redden in
his individual capacity for monetary damages for using excessive force
against him on November 18, 2017, in violation of the Eighth Amendment;
(2) DISMISSES all other claims;
(3) DISMISSES Lt. Connelly and Capt. Dykstra;
(4) DIRECTS the clerk and the United States Marshals Service to
issue and serve process on Sgt. Redden at the Indiana Department of
Correction with a copy of this order and the amended complaint (ECF 12)
as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); and
(5) ORDERS Sgt. Redden to respond, as provided for in the FEDERAL
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE and N.D. IND. L.R. 10.1, only to the claim for
which the pro se plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this
screening order.
3
SO ORDERED on August 16, 2018
/s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr.
Judge
United States District Court
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?