Hiser v. Warden

Filing 13

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 11 Motion to Dismiss. This case is now dismissed and the clerk is directed to close this case, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 8/27/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mlc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION MICHAEL HISER, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:18-CV-128-JD-MGG OPINION AND ORDER Michael Hiser, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed an amended habeas corpus petition challenging his prison disciplinary hearing in MCF 17-07-556 where a Disciplinary Hearing Officer (DHO) at the Miami Correctional Facility found him guilty of aiding an assault or battery resulting in serious bodily injury in violation of A-111/A102 on July 20, 2017. ECF 5 at 1, ECF 11-2. As a result, Hiser was sanctioned with the loss of 3 days earned credit time and demoted one credit class. ECF 11-2. After Hiser filed his petition, the finding of guilt and sanctions were vacated. ECF 11-1. The Warden has filed a motion to dismiss because this case is now moot. ECF 11. Hiser did not file a response and the time for doing so has passed. See N.D. Ind. L. Cr. R. 47-2. Regardless, the court cannot overturn the disciplinary proceeding and restore his time because the Indiana Department of Correction has already vacated the proceeding and restored his time. That is to say, Hiser has already won and there is no case left for this court to decide. Accordingly, this case must be dismissed. See Hadley v. Holmes, 341 F.3d 661, 664 (7th Cir. 2003) (prisoner can challenge prison disciplinary determination in habeas proceeding only when it resulted in a sanction that lengthened the duration of his confinement). For these reasons, the motion (ECF 11) is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED. The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. SO ORDERED on August 27, 2018 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?