Brown v. Warden

Filing 17

ORDER GRANTING 15 motion and DISMISSING the case. The clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 5/7/2019. (Copy mailed to pro se party by certified mail 7000 1670 0012 9261 0013)(bas)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION BRYAN KEITH BROWN, Petitioner, v. CAUSE NO.: 3:18-CV-396-JD-MGG WARDEN, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Bryan Keith Brown, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the prison disciplinary hearing (ISP 18-03-0332) that was held on March 28, 2018, where the Disciplinary Hearing Body (DHB) found him guilty of Refusing to Submit Sample for Testing in violation of B-203. As a result, he was sanctioned with the loss of 90 days earned credit time. After Brown filed his petition, the finding of guilt and sanctions were vacated. (ECF 15-1 at 1.) The Warden has filed a motion to dismiss because this case is now moot. (ECF 15.) Brown did not file a response and the time for doing so has passed. See N.D. Ind. L.R. 7-1(d)(2)(A). Regardless, the court cannot overturn the disciplinary proceeding and restore his time because the Indiana Department of Correction has already vacated the proceeding and restored his time. That is to say, Brown has already won and there is no case left for this court to decide. Accordingly, this case must be dismissed. See Hadley v. Holmes, 341 F.3d 661, 664 (7th Cir. 2003) (prisoner can challenge prison disciplinary determination in habeas proceeding only when it resulted in a sanction that lengthened the duration of his confinement). For these reasons, the motion (ECF 15) is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED. The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. SO ORDERED on May 7, 2019 /s/ JON E. DEGUILIO JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?