STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. OOGLES N GOOGLES et al
Filing
50
ORDER granting pltf's 49 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to 10/31/2005 re 34 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint . Signed by Judge Tim A. Baker on 10/25/05. (SWM, )
STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. OOGLES N GOOGLES et al
Doc. 50
Case 1:05-cv-00354-DFH-TAB
Document 50
Filed 10/25/2005
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC. Plaintiff, vs. OOGLES N GOOGLES, an Indiana corporation; KEVIN MENDELL; DANYA MENDELL; MICHELLE COTE; ROB LENDERMAN; STACEY LENDERMAN; BRENDA MURTY; MARGIE THOMAS; ROB SLYTER; ELIZABETH SLYTER; CORINNA SPARKS; CHRISTINE WATERBURRY; LEIGH SUNDLING; and TINA CARTAYA, Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 1:05-cv-0354-DFH-TAB
ORDER ON MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
This matter having come before the Court on the Motion for Additional Enlargement of Time filed by Plaintiff, and the Court having been duly advised on the premises, said Motion is hereby GRANTED; IT IS THEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff has until October 31, 2005 to file its answer brief to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
10/25/2005 Dated: ____________________
_________________________________________ JUDGE, United States District Court _______________________________ Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division Tim A. Baker United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of Indiana
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:05-cv-00354-DFH-TAB
Document 50
Filed 10/25/2005
Page 2 of 2
Distribution to: John David Hoover HOOVER HULL BAKER & HEATH LLP jdhoover@hooverhull.com
David J. Zack Burlington, Weil, Schwiep, Kaplan & Blonsky, P.A. dzack@bwskb.com
Kevin C. Kaplan David J. Zack Burlington, Weil, Schwiep, Kaplan & Blonsky, P.A. kkaplan@bwskb.com Bryan S. Redding Cohen Garelick & Glazier bredding@cgglawfirm.com
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?