IN RE: READY-MIXED CONCRETE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Filing 696

ORDER granting plaintiffs' 694 Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement with Lex Group, LLC. (S.O.). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 11/21/08. (MAC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION IN RE: READY-MIXED CONCRETE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, ) Master Docket No. ) 1:05-cv-00979-SEB-JMS ) ) ) ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH LEX GROUP, LLC This matter comes before the Court on the Motion of Plaintiffs' Motion for Court Approval of Settlement Agreement with Outside Settlement Claims Service Lex Group, LLC, which was filed with the cooperation and agreement of counsel for Lex Group. The Court, having reviewed Plaintiffs' Motion, as well as Plaintiffs' previously-filed Motion for Relief Regarding Outside Settlement Claims Service Lex Group, LLC (and supporting materials), and otherwise being duly advised in the premises, now finds that Plaintiffs' Motion is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the Settlement Agreement attached to Plaintiffs' Motion is hereby approved. Pursuant to the Court's authority pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), the Court hereby orders and declares that any contracts between Lex Group and potential class members related to this case are null and void, and will have no effect in this litigation. Counsel for the Plaintiffs and Lex Group are hereby ordered to take all necessary action to promptly implement the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 11/21/2008 ___________________ Date ___________________________________ _______________________________ Judge, United States District Court SARAH EVANS BARKER, For theUnited States District Court JUDGE Southern District of Indiana Southern District of Indiana

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?