GOCKE v. POTTER

Filing 45

ENTRY Dismissing Action; plaintiff's response 44 to the directions in Part III of this court's 1/16/08 41 , fails to identify a viable basis upon which her complaint may proceed. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendant's motion to dismiss 37 is Denied as Moot. Final Judgment shall now be entered (S.E.) cm. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/5/08.(MAC)

GOCKE v. POTTER

Doc. 45

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

SUZANNE KAY GOCKE, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN POTTER, Postmaster General, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 1:07-cv-163-SEB-TAB

Entry Dismissing Action The court, having considered the above action and the matters which are pending, makes the following rulings: 1. The plaintiff's response (dkt. 44) to the directions in Part III of this court's January 16, 2008 Entry (dkt. 41), fails to identify a viable basis upon which her complaint may proceed. Accordingly, and for the reasons stated in such Entry, this action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. 3. The defendant's motion to dismiss (dkt. 37) is denied as moot. Final judgment consistent with this Entry shall now be entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 02/05/2008
_______________________________ SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Indiana

Dockets.Justia.com