NERDS ON CALL, INC. v. INTERNET BILLING SERVICES, INC. et al

Filing 36

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to February 7, 2008 in which to 32 Answer Defendants' Counterclaims, filed by Plaintiff NERDS ON CALL, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Order (proposed) on Plaintiff's Unopposed Request for Extension of Time to Reply to Counterclaims)(Minch, Theodore)

Download PDF
NERDS ON CALL, INC. v. INTERNET BILLING SERVICES, INC. et al Doc. 36 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION NERDS ON CALL, INC., Plaintiff, v. INTERNET BILLING SERVICES, INC., and RYAN ELDRIDGE, Individually, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:07-cv-0535-DFH-TAB PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS Comes now Plaintiff, NERDS ON CALL, INC., by counsel, Theodore J. Minch, and respectfully requests a thirty (30) day extension of time to respond to Defendants' Counterclaims, and in support, alleges and says as follows: 1. Defendants filed their Answer and Counterclaims on December 19, 2007 (hereinafter the "Counterclaims"). 2. In accordance with Fed.R.Civ.Pro 12(B), Plaintiff's response to the Counterclaims was due on January 8, 2008; Plaintiff has not previously requested an extension of time to respond to the Counterclaims. 3. As a result of counsel for Plaintiff's court and trial schedules, some of which are out of state in the Southern District of New York and the Central District of California, counsel for Plaintiff has not had adequate opportunity to complete Plaintiff's response to the Counterclaims. 4. Plaintiff, by counsel, contacted Defendants, by counsel, on this date, January 8, 2008 with regard to this request for extension of time; based upon the foregoing circumstances, Dockets.Justia.com Defendants, by counsel, have no objection to the entry of a thirty (30) day extension of time until and including February 7, 2008 for Plaintiff to file its response to the Counterclaims. 5. This request is not for the purpose of undue delay, is just, necessary, and proper in light of the foregoing circumstances, and should this request be denied, Plaintiff will be irreparably and unjustly prejudiced. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, NERDS ON CALL, INC., by counsel Theodore J. Minch, hereby respectfully requests the Court grant Plaintiff a thirty (30) day extension of time until and including February 7, 2008 for Plaintiff to file Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Counterclaims, and for all other appropriate and just relief in the premises. Dated: January 8, 2008 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Theodore J. Minch______________ Theodore J. Minch, #18798-49 Attorney for Plaintiff Nerds on Call, Inc. SOVICH MINCH, LLP 10099 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 100 McCordsville, Indiana 46055 (317) 335-3601 (t) (317) 335-3602 (f) e-mail ­ tjminch@sovichminch.com PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing was served upon the following counsel for record this 8th day of January, 2008 via electronic mail only: Jonathan G. Polak, #21954-49 SOMMER BARNARD PC One Indiana Square, Suite 3500 Indianapolis, IN 46204 e-mail: jpolak@sommerbarnard.com /s/ Theodore J. Minch______________ Theodore J. Minch, #18798-49 SOVICH MINCH, LLP Attorney for Plaintiff Nerds on Call, Inc. E-Mail: tjminch@sovichminch.com 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?