NERDS ON CALL, INC. v. INTERNET BILLING SERVICES, INC. et al

Filing 60

Witness List (Preliminary), filed by Plaintiff NERDS ON CALL, INC (INDIANA). (Minch, Theodore)

Download PDF
NERDS ON CALL, INC. v. INTERNET BILLING SERVICES, INC. et al Doc. 60 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION NERDS ON CALL, INC. (INDIANA) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NERDS ON CALL, INC. (CALIFORNIA), ) and RYAN ELDRIDGE, Individually, ) ) Defendants. ) CASE NO. 1:07-cv-0535-DFH-TAB PLAINTIFF'S PRELIMINARY WITNESS LIST Pursuant to the Parties' Case Management Plan, as approved on July 2, 2008, and as disclosed to Defendants on July 30, 2008 via Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures, Plaintiff NERDS ON CALL, INC. (Indiana) ("Nerds Indiana") hereby files with the Court and submits to NERDS ON CALL, INC. (California) and Ryan Eldridge, individually (hereinafter collectively "Defendants"), by counsel, Plaintiff's Preliminary Witness List, as follows: 1. Kevin Bouchonnet Subjects: Creation and operation of Nerds Indiana. Linda Bouchonnet Subjects: Creation and operation of Nerds Indiana. Tom Long Subjects: Creation and operation of Nerds Indiana, particularly in the area of Nerds Indiana's corporate financial status. Richard Lett Subjects: Creation and use of the mark NERDS ON CALL (the "Mark"). John Arnold Subjects: Creation and use of the Mark. J. Matt Verner Subjects: Creation and use of the Mark. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 7. Scott Barnett Subjects: Use of the Mark and day-to-day business operations of Nerds Indiana. Fortune Ighodalo Subjects: Enforcement and protection of the trademark rights associated with the Mark. Dan Garner Subjects: Enforcement and protection of the trademark rights associated with the Mark. Gloria Litz Subjects: Use and / or the licensing of the Mark by Nerds Indiana. James C. Nebbers Subjects: Enforcement and protection of the trademark rights associated with the Mark. Brock Peterson Subjects: Enforcement and protection of the trademark rights associated with the Mark and / or the licensing thereof by Nerds Indiana. Ryan Eldridge Subjects: Creation and operation of Defendants. Andrea Eldridge Subjects: Creation and operation of Defendants. Accounting / Finance Person for Defendants Subjects: Financial data as associated with Defendants and Defendants use of the Mark. All other witnesses identified by Defendants as potential witnesses on behalf of Defendants in this Case. Nerds Indiana hereby reserves the right to amend said preliminary witness list upon learning of any other individuals during final discovery or trial who may have information relevant to this Case, who become known to Nerds Indiana at trial, and / or who may be used to impeach or rebut a specific presumption asserted by a witness for Defendants. Defendants, by counsel, will be notified upon the discovery of any such individuals. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 2 Dated: July 30, 2008 SOVICH MINCH, LLP /s/ Theodore J. Minch______________ Theodore J. Minch, #18798-49 Attorney for Plaintiff Nerds on Call, Inc. 10099 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 100 McCordsville, Indiana 46055 (317) 335-3601 (t) (317) 335-3602 (f) e-mail ­ tjminch@sovichminch.com PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing was served upon the following counsel for record for Defendants this 30th day of July, 2008 via electronic mail only: Daniel N. Ballard, Esq. SEQUOIA COUNSEL PC 770 L St., Suite 950 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 449-3950 Facsimile: (916) 200-0601 e-mail: dballard@sequoiacounsel.com Jonathan G. Polak, Esq. TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP One Indiana Square, Suite 3500 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Telephone: (317) 713-3500 Facsimile: (317) 713-3699 e-mail: jpolak@sommerbarnard.com /s/ Theodore J. Minch______________ Theodore J. Minch, #18798-49 SOVICH MINCH, LLP Attorney for Plaintiff Nerds on Call, Inc. E-Mail: tjminch@sovichminch.com 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?