ESSICK v. ESSICK et al

Filing 45

ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated herein, defendants' motions for summary judgment are granted. General Motors and MetLife's renewed motion for attorney fees (dkt 42 at 5-6) is denied. Final judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge David Frank Hamilton on 12/17/2008.(LBK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION BETTY ESSICK, Plaintiff, v. GLORIA D. ESSICK, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND ADMINISTRATOR/ CLAIMS FIDUCIARY OF THEIR GROUP LIFE CLAIMS, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:07-cv-0795-DFH-JMS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FINAL JUDGMENT The court has issued today its entry granting defendants' motions for summary judgment. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiff Betty Essick take nothing by her complaint against defendants Gloria D. Essick, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, and Administrator/Claims Fiduciary of their Group Life Claims, General Motors Corporation, and that this action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with costs (but not attorney fees) to defendants. Date: December 17, 2008 DAVID F. HAMILTON, CHIEF JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Laura Briggs, Clerk United States District Court By: Deputy Clerk Copies to: Philip John Gutwein, II BAKER & DANIELS LLP philip.gutwein@bakerd.com, lynn.wolfhope@bakerd.com Edward E. Hollis BAKER & DANIELS LLP eehollis@bakerd.com, carol.drumwright@bakerd.com Bridget L. O'Ryan O'RYAN LAW FIRM boryan@oryanlawfirm.com Irving Marshall Pinkus PINKUS & PINKUS impinkus@aol.com, pinkusj2@aol.com -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?