Filing 18

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Sarah Evans Barker: Scheduling Conference held on 5/13/2008, Plaintiffs Dispositive Motions due by 5/23/2008; Defendants Response shall be filed by 6/6/08; Plaintiffs Reply by 6/12/08 (See Order). (MAC)

Download PDF
BIG HAT BOOKS et al v. PROSECUTORS: Doc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION BIG HAT BOOKS, et. al, Plaintiffs, vs. PROSECUTORS, et. al, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:08-cv-596- SEB-TAB ENTRY ON TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE On May 13, 2008, the parties appeared, by counsel, for an informal, telephonic scheduling conference. It was discussed and agreed that the parties will address the merits of this action by summary judgment motion pursuant to the following schedule: ! On or before May 19, 2008, Plaintiffs shall provide Defendants with advance, courtesy copies of the affidavits that Plaintiffs expect to utilize in support of their summary judgment motion. On or before May 23, 2008, Plaintiffs shall file their summary judgment motion. Defendants' response shall be filed on or before June 6, 2008. Plaintiffs' reply shall be filed on or before June 12, 2008. Requests for oral argument should be made in accordance with Ind. S.D. Local Rule 7.5. ! ! ! ! The Court will make every effort to rule on the anticipated summary judgment motion before the July 1, 2008, effective date of the statute at issue. If that becomes impossible, the Court will address the request for injunctive relief. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 05/16/2008 _______________________________ SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Copies to: Matthew Thomas Albaugh BAKER & DANIELS David A. Arthur INDIANA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL Michael A. Bamberger SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP 1221 Avenue of the Americas 23rd Floor New York, NY 10020 Eric James Beaver INDIANA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL Kenneth J. Falk ACLU OF INDIANA Jon Laramore BAKER & DANIELS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?