Filing 194

ORDER denying plaintiff's 162 Motion to add additional individuals as defendants in this action (S.O.) cm. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/24/2010. (MAC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA KAY KIM, Plaintiff, v. LAURA RITTER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:08-cv-1644-SEB-DML Entry and Notice In response to the plaintiff's request (dkt 162) that the clerk add certain putative defendants to the docket, the Court directed (dkt 167) that the plaintiff "file a statement setting forth any claim and the basis for any claim against the putative defendants identified in paragraph 6 of her request" and directed that she do so no later than March 12, 2010. The plaintiff has acknowledged receipt of the foregoing instructions through her filing of February 18, 2010, but principally complains of what she perceives as irregularities over the course of this case. Important for the present purpose is that the plaintiff has not complied with the directions in the order referred to above and the time within which she was to do so has passed. The plaintiff seems intent on proceeding in this action based on her own notions and not in accord with the rules and rulings of the Court. This will not do. James v. McDonald's Corp., 417 F.3d 672, 681 (7th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, having failed to supply the information directed in paragraph 2 of the Court's Entry of February 11, 2010, the plaintiff's request that additional individuals be added as defendants in this action is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 03/24/2010 _______________________________ SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distribution: Kathy Jo Bradley OFFICE OF THE INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL James A. Edgar J. EDGAR LAW OFFICES, PC. Akia Haynes INDIANA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Jonathan Lamont Mayes CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CORPORATION COUNSEL Kay Kim 542225 4250 Village Parkway Circle, Apt. #2 Indianapolis, IN 46254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?