EPPLEY, MD, DMD v. IACOVELLI
Filing
226
ORDER denying 219 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/7/2010. c/m (cc: USCA re: CA #10-3215.) (TMA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
DR. BARRY EPPLEY, MD, DMD, Plaintiff, vs. LUCILLE IACOVELLI, Defendant.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. 1:09-cv-386-SEB-DML CA #10-3215
Entry Discussing Request to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis Non-party Richard Bergeron's request for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (dkt 219) is denied. An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915; see Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). "Good faith" within the meaning of § 1915 must be judged by an objective, not a subjective, standard. Id. There is no objectively reasonable argument which Mr. Bergeron could present to argue that the order finding him in contempt or the order imposing sanctions for such contempt were erroneousnor does his request for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis even suggest such an argument. In pursuing an appeal, the plaintiff "is acting in bad faith . . . [because] to sue in bad faith means merely to sue on the basis of a frivolous claim, which is to say a claim that no reasonable person could suppose to have any merit." Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025, 1026 (7th Cir. 2000). IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: 10/07/2010
_______________________________ SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Indiana
Distribution: Gary P. Price gprice@lewis-kappes.com Todd Arthur Richardson trichardson@lewis-kappes.com Joseph Peter Rompala jrompala@lewis-kappes.com Lucille Iacovelli 3 Deer Hollow Road Forestdale, MA 02644 Rich Bergeron 107 Cotton Hill Road Belmont, NH 03220
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?