MILLS v. IDOC et al

Filing 25

ENTRY: "District judges have no obligation to act as counsel or paralegal to pro se litigants." Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004). This explains why the court declines to either answer or discuss the questions presented in the plaintiff's filing of May 24, 2010 23 . Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/27/2010.(DWH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA JOSEPH MILLS, SR., Plaintiff, vs. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:09-cv-695-WTL-TAB ENTRY "District judges have no obligation to act as counsel or paralegal to pro se litigants." Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004). This explains why the court declines to either answer or discuss the questions presented in the plaintiff's filing of May 24, 2010 (dkt 23). IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 05/27/2010 _______________________________ Distribution: Joseph Mills Sr. 157239 Plainfield Correctional Facility 727 Moon Road Plainfield, IN 46168 Hon. William T. Lawrence, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?