SECREST v. ASTRUE

Filing 30

CLOSED FINAL JUDGMENT: For the reasons set forth in the Court's Entry Reviewing the Commissioner's Decision, also issued this day and incorporated by reference here, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant, VACATES the decision denying Plaintiff benefits, and REMANDS this matter for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (sentence four). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/21/2010.(SWM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION JACKIE L. SECREST, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:09-cv-00708-JMS-RLY FINAL JUDGMENT For the reasons set forth in the Court's Entry Reviewing the Commissioner's Decision, also issued this day and incorporated by reference here, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant, VACATES the decision denying Plaintiff benefits, and REMANDS this matter for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (sentence four).1 05/21/2010 _______________________________ Jane Magnus-Stinson United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of Indiana Distribution via CM/ECF only: Thomas E. Kieper UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE tom.kieper@usdoj.gov Joseph W. Shull jshull@pngusa.net Upon the written consent of the parties, this matter has been assigned to the magistrate judge for all proceedings, including for the entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 73. [Dkt. 6.] 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?