COOK INCORPORATED v. ENDOLOGIX, INC.

Filing 46

ORDER denying Pltf's 40 Motion to Lift Stay (see Order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 4/13/2010. (SWM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION COOK INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. ENDOLOGIX, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01248-WTL-TAB ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO LIFT STAY This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion to lift stay [Docket No. 40], to which Defendant objects. The Court previously stayed this action following briefing and oral argument because the Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") was reexamining the patents at issue in this litigation. [Docket No. 39.] The '706 patent has now emerged unscathed from the PTO review, but review of the '777 patent continues. For the reasons set forth in Defendant's objection, the Court denies Plaintiff's motion to lift stay. Specifically, the previous stay was based upon the pending PTO action on both the '706 and '777 patents. While review of the '706 patent has concluded, review of the '777 patent continues. Plaintiff brought this single action to challenge both patents, which are part of a single product. [Docket No. 42 at 7-8.] So the ongoing review of the '777 patent remains a hurdle to lifting the stay. Proceeding otherwise risks duplicating these proceedings and increasing costs. In addition, as noted in the original stay order, Plaintiff struggles to show how delay will result in undue prejudice given that the '706 patent has expired and the '777 patent will expire relatively soon. [Docket No. 39 at 3.] Finally, the PTO's expedient review of the '706 patent suggests that the '777 patent will receive similar treatment. For these reasons, and as more fully set forth in Defendant's objection, Plaintiff's motion to lift stay [Docket No. 40] is denied. Dated: 04/12/2010 _______________________________ Tim A. Baker United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of Indiana Copies to: Daniel K. Burke HOOVER HULL LLP dburke@hooverhull.com Randy Lee Campbell Jr. BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE rcampbell@usebrinks.com Kelly J. Eberspecher BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE keberspecher@brinkshofer.com J. David Evered John B. Sganga Jr. Joshua J. Stowell KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP. 2040 Main Street Fourteenth Floor Irvine, CA 92614 Andrew W. Hull HOOVER HULL LLP awhull@hooverhull.com Richard A. Kaplan BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE rkaplan@usebrinks.com Bradley G. Lane BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE blane@brinkshofer.com Danielle Anne Phillip BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE dphillip@brinkshofer.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?