HUGHES v. SCHUCK et al

Filing 44

ENTRY: The court declines to educate the plaintiff in the manner sought previously and again in his filing of September 15, 2010. Without acquiring jurisdiction over the defendant, the defendant's obligation to answer the complaint has not been triggered. If the plaintiff seeks an entry of default against the defendant, he may, of course, request that step. Additionaly The clerk shall include a copy of the docket sheet with the plaintiffs copy of this Entry **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/17/2010.(JD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA MICHAEL HUGHES, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER ASH, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:09-cv-1536-TWP-TAB ENTRY I. "District judges have no obligation to act as counsel or paralegal to pro se litigants." Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004). This explains why the court declines to educate the plaintiff in the manner sought previously and again in his filing of September 15, 2010. As to the latter filing, moreover, the plaintiff appears to equate the defendant's employer, the Indiana Department of Correction, with the defendant himself for the purpose of bearing liability for any recovery to which the plaintiff may become entitled. The defendant's employer is not liable in the manner implied through this incorrect thinking. Rodriguez v. Plymouth Ambulance Serv., 577 F.3d 816 (7th Cir. 2009). In addition, the plaintiff also reveals his belief that the defendant is in default for not having filed an answer to the complaint. This impression is also mistaken, because as explained in Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344, 351 (1999), "[u]nless a named defendant agrees to waive service, the summons continues to function as the sine qua non directing an individual or entity to participate in a civil action or forgo procedural or substantive rights." See Omni Capital Int'l, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., 484 U.S. 97, 104 (1987) ("Before a . . . court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant, the procedural requirement of service of summons must be satisfied."). Without acquiring jurisdiction over the defendant, the defendant's obligation to answer the complaint has not been triggered. If the plaintiff seeks an entry of default against the defendant, he may, of course, request that step. II. The clerk shall include a copy of the docket sheet with the plaintiff's copy of this Entry. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 09/17/2010 Distribution: Michael Hughes DOC #922417 Miami Correctional Facility Inmate Mail/Parcels 8038 W. 850 South Bunker Hill, IN 46914 ________________________ Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana NOTE TO CLERK: PROCESSING THIS DOCUMENT REQUIRES ACTIONS OTHER THAN DOCKETING AND DISTRIBUTION.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?