LESLIE v. POTTER

Filing 17

ENTRY: Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel 13 must be DENIED **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/16/2010. (DWH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA RICHARD D. LESLIE, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN E. POTTER, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:09-cv-1588-WTL-JMS Entry Denying Motion for Appointment of Counsel The plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel has been considered. Litigants requesting that counsel be recruited must show as a threshold matter that they made a reasonable attempt on their own to secure private counsel. Gil v. Reed, 381 F.3d 649, 656 (7th Cir. 2004); Zarnes v. Rhodes, 64 F.3d 285, 288 (7th Cir. 1995). The court must deny "out of hand" a request for counsel made without a showing of such effort. Farmer v. Haas, 990 F.2d 319, 321 (7th Cir. 1993). The plaintiff's single sentence motion does not indicate that he has made any attempt to obtain counsel. Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel (dkt 13) must be denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 03/16/2010 Distribution: Debra G. Richards UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE debra.richards@usdoj.gov RICHARD D. LESLIE 9119 Prairie Ridge Place Indianapolis, IN 46256-3498 _______________________________ Hon. William T. Lawrence, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?